undefined

Some people trust judges in our country to do the right thing, to follow the law, to uphold justice, to follow the U.S. Constitution, and to be worthy of respect.  Sadly, few judges perform their duties as they swore they would.  Many do the exact opposite of what they are supposed to do.  Some even belong in prison—and not because they are simply disliked but because they have actually committed crimes.

It is quite likely that their crimes go unnoticed for two main reasons:

  1. Everyday people trust them to do the right thing and therefore don't think they would ever break the law.
  2. Everyday people don't know the rules and laws that (are supposed to) govern our "justice" system and therefore don't know when these miscreants are breaking them.

Expounding on the second tenet, if you play a game with someone—one you've never played before—and you end up losing the game, how would you possibly know that the other person played by the rules if that very same person is telling you what the "rules" are?  The answer is obvious.

Now consider a "game" wherein not only are the rules deliberately obscure, or even made up out of thin air whenever desired, but there is no true oversight of the rule-makers.  Such a scenario brings about cheating at least an order of magnitude worse than possible in any ordinary game you might play as a novice.  I could provide countless stories of innocent people, both nationally and internationally, who have contacted me because they have been victimized by criminals in black gowns in our U.S. legal system—a.k.a the world's largest crime syndicate.  I actually prove the latter part of this statement in chapter 1 of my second book, which can be read free here.

At this point, you may wonder why such individuals can be so nefarious.  In a nutshell, the reason is as follows.  People tend to do things for which they have a proclivity.  A man who has a good arm for throwing something accurately or fast might become a professional baseball pitcher or football quarterback.  An intelligent person who has the desire to solve problems might become a research scientist or engineer.  And similarly, a person who likes to manipulate people and do questionable things without any real accountability might become a lawyer. 

Now, of these lawyers, the ones who want even more power, more money, and no accountability whatsoever become judges.  So, it's the worst of the worst, not the best of the best, who assume the bench.  Not to paint with a broad brush since there are exceptions to the preceding, but by and large, this logic applies much of the time.  Human nature dictates it.

For the purposes of this post, I will limit the criminal misbehavior to just several handfuls of specific bad actors involved in my own personal legal battles.  Understand that—based on a sizable data set of 200-plus—less than one-half of 1 percent of syndicate members have any integrity whatsoever.  The margin of error with that estimated percentage is only 7 percent at a 95 percent confidence level.

Keep in mind that I am the world's leading expert on the corrupt U.S. legal system.  This isn't a title I cherish; believe me.  However, I am not claiming to be an expert in law.  Understand that the law and the legal system have absolutely nothing to do with each other anymore.  The following so-called judges are not listed in any particular order.

Joseph Leonard Michaud

This individual in the People's Republic of Massachusetts was a lawyer when my battle with him first began.  This king of the criminals in black gowns was appointed judge in 2018.  Instead of recounting the multitude of his crimes here, they can be read in several other locations, this one, for example, and the associated links within it.

Mary Susan McElroy

As a result of the crimes Michaud committed against me—one of which was stealing my mother's $360,000 condominium to pay for the $30,000 fraudulent debt he masterminded against me—I sued him in U.S. district court in order to force him to return the stolen property.  McElroy was assigned the case and initially did the right thing by ordering the case to move forward and service by U.S. marshals to commence.  However, Michaud or one of his minions had their PACER account set for automatic new case notification, and he contacted the court immediately after the case was posted on PACER.  McElroy committed no less than one federal felony, 18 U.S.C. § 4, by trying to hide Michaud's felonies with her dispositive rulings.  As with Michaud, more about her criminal conduct can be found at the link in the last paragraph.

John James McConnell Jr.

I informed this judge via email about the criminal conduct of Michaud and McElroy.  His response was to ignore my message and not lift a toxic finger to bring her to justice.  In doing so, he became a felon himself according to 18 U.S. Code § 4 and case law across the nation from all U.S. circus courts and from the U.S. Supreme Syndicate, which is crystal clear on the subject.  Not only must a person know a felony has been committed—and he certainly does because I clearly articulated this in my email to him—but s/he must do “some affirmative act of concealment,” of which failing to act remedially qualifies.  See, for instance, Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972).

Andrea Kneifel Johnstone

After suing Michaud and all the judges in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island—two of whom have proved themselves to be criminals, McConnell and McElroy—this individual became a felon herself by trying to hide their crimes. Like most of the judge-criminals written about in this post, she violated 18 U.S. Code § 4.

Jeffrey Robert Howard, William Joseph Kayatta Jr., Gustavo Antonio Gelpí Jr.

These particular individuals became felons according to 18 U.S. Code § 4 when they tried to squash the evidence of criminal misconduct against Michaud and McElroy by refusing to order the district court to follow the Constitution and the law.....and to actually uphold justice.

Eric David Miller, Lawrence James Christopher VanDyke, Mark Jeremy Bennett

I sued Kristin Tavia Mihelic, Tiffany Louise Carroll, and Louise DeCarl Adler because they behaved criminally in a bankruptcy I was forced to file because Michaud was trying to steal my mother's condo to pay the fraudulent debt he created.  These criminals in black gowns are employed in the Ninth Circus Court of Appeals.  Like the three criminals in the last paragraph, they also violated 18 U.S. Code § 4 by flushing the case against Mihelic, Carroll, and DeCarl Adler without reporting their crimes so they could be prosecuted.

Gary Allan Spraker, Julia Wagner Brand, Robert Jay Faris

Once my bankruptcy was illegally blocked, these three criminals stepped up to the plate to ensure that injustice would continue to prevail.  I actually hammered the piss out of them not long ago during a façade of a hearing.  This was my one shot to openly excoriate the syndicate since now the word is out, and it has blocked and continues to block me from ever revealing criminal misconduct in one of its forums ever again.  In their "memorandum," they said my accusations were nothing but "inuendo" [sic].  They also lied when stating, "The record does not support the conclusions he attempts to draw."  I have and did present a mountain of evidence.  In fact, the evidence was so strong and overwhelming in the record that a clerk at the U.S. Supreme Syndicate told me over the phone that the case had been sealed.  In a long string of dispositive rulings issued to hide crime, these three criminals also violated 18 U.S. Code § 4.

Jennifer Sung, Holly Aiyisha Thomas

At the appellate level for my bankruptcy, an almost new set of three criminals was assigned to my case.  Two were criminal-Sung and criminal-Thomas.  One was criminal-Bennett already mentioned.  They became felons pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 4 the instant they flushed my case and continued to ignore criminal activity by their evil brethren and sistren below them.  It is important to understand that more than 99 percent of chapter 7 bankruptcies are granted according to the syndicate's own website.  This alone screams corruption regarding my matter.  However, when crime and corruption are working in the opposite direction, that is, trying to push a bankruptcy through rather than blocking it, the syndicate has no problem discharging a "debt."  Someone in my national network was victimized when a spouse filed a bankruptcy that was rife with fraud and no less than eleven felonies.  The "debtor"-spouse even had difficulty qualifying for Chapter 7.  Yet in that instance, when crime and corruption are 180 degrees out of phase from what I experienced—the discharge is granted.....because, once again, the syndicate and its lackeys benefit.

Bora Chon, Cristelle Conanan, Sang Banh, Veronica Williams, Donghyuk Shin, Bridget Homer, Genevieve Perez, Patrick Cooney, Douglas DiCicco  

These criminals are administrative law judges (ALJs) in the state of BIG blue.  Unlike other glorified lawyers in black gowns who are appointed or elected, these "judges" simply apply for the position and get hired.  During many state hearings, I revealed violations of 18 U.S. Code §§ 4, 152, 157, 241, 1001, 1018, 1341, 1349, 1503, 1505, 1512, 1519, 1621, 1623, 3057—possibly other federal crimes—and numerous state crimes committed by the perpetrators already named.  Mind you, of the preceding federal crimes and unlisted state crimes combined, no less than seventeen are felonies.  These ALJs, like the other criminals above, became felons by trying to conceal these crimes in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 4 and existing case law.

I even brought two of my cases to the U.S. Supreme Syndicate.  There are criminals in that courthouse too.  Unlike other official rulings, however, my petitions were blocked there without anyone putting a name to the denial.  I'm not completely clear on the inner workings of the highest division of the syndicate, so it may have been lowly law clerks or staff attorneys who flushed me, or it may indeed have been one or more of the nine.  Nonetheless, because nobody did the right thing and brought the thirty-plus criminals to justice below them despite my letter cautioning that they would also be violating U.S. Code § 4, at least one person even there is a criminal pursuant to U.S. Code § 4 in a long ongoing chain reaction.  Thus, as the title of this post implies, there are judge-criminals at all levels, possibly even at the nation's highest court.

In spite of only mentioning violations of 18 U.S. Code § 4 for most of the above criminals, a case could be made for them obstructing justice and/or evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 1512 or violating other federal, state, or local laws.  There are over 1 million laws at all levels, so to presume that the above lawbreakers only violated a single one of them would be folly.  I've already proved in other writings, including my second book, that Michaud broke many criminal laws—some of them multiple times.

If you've made it reading this far, you must know by now the underlying mantra.  Apparently, committing crimes is perfectly fine—if the offender is on the "right team."  Perhaps the biggest point made in the entire post is this: the difference between street criminals and the ones wearing black gowns is that we pay the latter to commit crimes against us!  Let that sink in.  Until we unite and take action such as expressed here, here, and here, things will continue to worsen in Amerika.  Finally, remember that the world's largest crime syndicate will never attack you or your family.....

until it does.