Had John F. Kennedy been re-elected, the CIA had more to lose than any other intelligence agency.  Kennedy forced Allen Dulles, Richard Bissell, and Charles Cabell all to resign by 1962.  The CIA had surveilled Lee Oswald for at least four years prior to JFK’s assassination yet claimed they had no idea who he was.  Documents prove he was a CIA agent and an FBI informant.  Even after the assassination the CIA still had control of all intelligence since Allen Dulles, who hated JFK with a passion was placed on the Warren Commission by LBJ.  Had JFK lived, there probably would not be a CIA as we know it.

To the best of my knowledge, one thing that has never been reported in the mainstream media is how the U.S. legal system—which is the world's largest crime syndicate as I prove in chapter one of my second book that can be read for free—changes its rules of procedure and laws to suit its own narrative and harm unknowing litigants.  This post will be a case study of three different examples.

Access to the courts is fundamental to our constitutional republic, but funding for the federal judiciary could run out at some point after a government shutdown.   What would happen should that occur is anyone’s guess.  What we do know is that a lack of funding for the courts could put the Constitution’s fundamental protections at risk.

After all of the bad press the U.S. Supreme Court has gotten in the last few years, one might imagine that adopting an ethics code would be a reasonable solution to its ongoing issues, right?  Well, not so much.  If the point is to subject the justices to practical oversight and supervision, an ethics code would likely fall short.  The justices would likely end up supervising themselves.  Justices are already required by law to recuse themselves where their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.  As a practical matter, a code might encourage politicized harassment of the justices without truly subjecting them to any real source of external authority.

Organized crime is rampant in the United States.  It is growing and getting worse all the time.  It costs the commoner billions of dollars each year.  It steals property, rewards criminal activity, and destroys lives.  No, it is not the Mafia or the illegal drug trade.  It is our illustrious U.S. “justice” system.  As I prove in chapter 1 of my second book, it is in fact the world’s largest crime syndicate.  This post will discuss two idealistic ways—although unachievable without significant public outcry—that it can be defeated.

"There can be no crime more serious than bribery.  Other offenses violate one law while corruption strikes at the foundation of all law...The exposure and punishment of public corruption is an honor to a nation, not a disgrace.  The shame lies in toleration, not in correction…."

— Theodore Roosevelt

In a recent ruling, the United States Supreme Court sided with a 94-year-old woman who accused the government of stealing her home equity.  Geraldine Tyler is a 94-year-old woman who got nothing from the sale of her condominium after the county pocketed the full $40,000 because she owed $15,000 in unpaid taxes and penalties.  The court ruled that keeping the additional $25,000 was unconstitutional.  The unanimous decision is a win for property owners under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.